Morningside Recovery Specializes in the
Treatment of Addiction and Dual Diagnosis

Call Now

Posts tagged as:

Dual-Diagnosis-Treatment

Substance-Induced Disorder Treatment

by Morningside Recovery Blog on February 16, 2009

Substance-induced disorders are distinct from independent co-occurring mental disorders in that all or most of the psychiatric symptoms are the direct result of substance use. This is not to state that substance-induced disorders preclude co-occurring mental disorders, only that the specific symptom cluster at a specific point in time is more likely the result of substance use, abuse, intoxication, or withdrawal than of underlying mental illness. A client might even have both independent and substance-induced mental disorders. For example, a client may present with well-established independent and controlled bipolar disorder and alcohol dependence in remission, but the same client could be experiencing amphetamine-induced auditory hallucinations and paranoia from an amphetamine abuse relapse over the last 3 weeks.

Symptoms of substance-induced disorders run the gamut from mild anxiety and depression (these are the most common across all substances) to full-blown manic and other psychotic reactions (much less common). The “teeter-totter principle”-i.e., what goes up must come down is useful to predict what kind of syndrome or symptoms might be caused by what substances. For example, acute withdrawal symptoms from physiological depressants such as alcohol and benzodiazepines are hyperactivity, elevated blood pressure, agitation, and anxiety (i.e., the shakes). On the other hand, those who “crash” from stimulants are tired, withdrawn, and depressed. Virtually any substance taken in very large quantities over a long enough period can lead to a psychotic state.

Because clients vary greatly in how they respond to both intoxication and withdrawal given the same exposure to the same substance, and also because different substances may be taken at the same time, prediction of any particular substance-related syndrome has its limits. What is most important is to continue to evaluate psychiatric symptoms and their relationship to abstinence or ongoing substance abuse over time. Most substance-induced symptoms begin to improve within hours or days after substance use has stopped. Notable exceptions to this are psychotic symptoms caused by heavy and long-term amphetamine abuse and the dementia (problems with memory, concentration, and problem solving) caused by using substances directly toxic to the brain, which most commonly include alcohol, inhalants like gasoline, and again amphetamines.

Diagnoses of substance-induced mental disorders will typically be provisional and will require reevaluation-sometimes repeatedly. Many apparent acute mental disorders may really be substance-induced disorders, such as in those clients who use substances and who are acutely suicidal.
Some people who have what appear to be substance-induced disorders may turn out to have both a substance-induced disorder and an independent mental disorder (dual-diagnosis). For most people who are addicted to substances, drugs eventually become more important than jobs, friends, family, and even children. These changes in priorities often look, sound, and feel like a personality disorder, but diagnostic clarity regarding personality disorders in general is difficult, and in clients with substance-related disorders the true diagnostic picture might not emerge or reveal itself for weeks or months. Moreover, it is not unusual for the symptoms of a personality disorder to clear with abstinence sometimes even fairly early in recovery. Preexisting mood state, personal expectations, drug dosage, and environmental surroundings all warrant consideration in developing an understanding of how a particular client might experience a substance-induced disorder. Treatment of the substance use disorder and an abstinent period of weeks or months may be required for a definitive diagnosis of an independent, co-occurring mental disorder. Our substance abuse treatment program and clinical staff can concentrate on screening for mental disorders and determining the severity and acuity of symptoms, along with an understanding of the client’s support network and overall life situation.

Morningside Recovery Drug Rehab program is an individualized and personalized treatment experience. Each client’s addiction treatment plan is formulated by all of our clinical staff, including our medical doctors, psychiatrists, psychologists, and addiction treatment professionals. We know that generalized programming is not always beneficial to clients and that the individual needs of client may vary. We focus on both addiction treatment and alcohol treatment, or one or the other if needed.

We believe that one-on-one treatment produces the best results. It is the rapport that develops between the client and the clinician that produces the most favorable results. Often clients have experienced trauma in their lives and this may be one of the many factors contributing to their drug and alcohol abuse. We provide a private, exclusive and comfortable environment in Newport Beach, CA to begin healing from these issues.

{ 0 comments }

Drug Treatment Program Lowers Jail Population

by Morningside Recovery Blog on December 23, 2008

The state’s 8-year-old program that mandates treatment instead of prison sentences for drug offenders is dramatically decreasing California’s jail population and saving taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars, according to a study released in 2006.
The study, prepared by the left-leaning Justice Policy Institute in Washington, echoes another report released by UCLA earlier this month that also touted huge taxpayer savings through doing away with prison sentences in favor of treatment. That report said the program, which was passed by voters in 2000 as Proposition 36, saved California $173 million in its first year and $2.50 for every dollar invested since then.
The report by the Justice Policy Institute, which seeks alternatives to incarceration, said the rate of imprisonment for drug possession offenses has decreased by more than 34%. It also said that dire predictions of a rise in violent crime with the passage of Proposition 36 were unfounded.
“It really helps to put a context to the debate,” said Jason Ziedenberg, the executive director of the Justice Policy Institute. “I think people need to understand how many people were in prison in 2000 as opposed to how many there are today and that there has been progress.”
The release of the two reports comes at a critical juncture for supporters who contend that the $120 million earmarked for Proposition 36 by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger when funding runs out this summer is not adequate.
They contend that, because of inflation and an increase in costs for services, the money does not stretch far enough.
“It really needs to be at $209 million just to be bare-bones adequate,” said Margaret Dooley, statewide coordinator with the Drug Policy Alliance, which is seeking an increase in funding for the program. She said she and others would descend on the capital later this month to drum up support for the additional funding, which she believed would be forthcoming because lawmakers would be unable to point to a downside.
She also said she was confident of support from the more than 60,000 people arrested but kept out of prisons and jails because of Proposition 36.
Scott Ehlers, a coauthor of the Justice Policy Institute report, said he and others believe that the next goal should be to expand the reach of Proposition 36 to include those arrested for nonviolent crimes related to drug abuse – such as theft to purchase drugs.
He also said he did not anticipate any calls for major trims in the program.
“I don’t see anyone calling for a rollback by any means because I think the treatment is more cost-effective than sending people to prison,” he said.
Among other findings of the report are that spending on drug treatment in the state since 2000 has doubled, and that there has been a larger increase in drug treatment clients here than in the rest of the country. Also, the California prison population of drug offenders has been reduced from 27% to 21%, close to the national average.
Ziedenberg said the reason the Justice Policy Institute focused on California – as it does in many of its studies – is that “12% of the prison population is locked up there.”
He also said lawmakers will have to face the question whether they want to pay now for expanded drug treatment or later for additional prison facilities to handle the overrun.
“The main thing is for more money to be put in,” he said. “The thing we hear from people in California is that this is a good start.”
To get help with Addiction now phone Morningside Recovery.

{ 0 comments }

Treatment for Drug Abusers in the Criminal Justice System

December 1, 2008

Scientific research since the mid-1970s shows that drug abuse treatment can help many drug abusing offenders change their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors towards drug abuse, avoid relapse, and successfully remove themselves from a life of substance abuse and crime. It is true that legal pressure might be needed to get a person into treatment and [...]

Read the full article →

Bipolar Disorder in Teens

May 19, 2008

Bipolar Disorder (also know as manic depression) often reveals itself in teens as severe moodiness and unhappiness. Often the first diagnosis is one of depression. Frequently bipolar disorder is initially misdiagnosed. It can take time to properly diagnos bipolar disorder. Treatment includes a combination of carefully monitored medication and professional counseling. Bipolar disorder manifests differently [...]

Read the full article →

Newport Beach Drug Rehab from Street View

May 15, 2008

Using Google Street View come take a look at our beautiful Newport Beach neighborhood. Morningside Recovery is located on historic Lido Isle. Take a tour of our Drug Rehab and Dual Diagnosis Treatment facility.

Read the full article →

Dual Diagnosis Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Substance Abuse Treatment Conclusion

February 25, 2008

For substance abuse patients, and therapy in general, the effectiveness of treatment is determined as much by the therapist as by any theoretical orientation or patient characteristics. With this dual-diagnosis population, it is often difficult to provide effective therapy. Therapist processes emphasized in Seeking Safety include compassion for patients’ experiences; using coping skills; giving patients [...]

Read the full article →

Dual Diagnosis PTSD and Substance Abuse Treatments and Issues / Part 4

February 24, 2008

A third study of a hundred inner-city outpatient women compared Seeking Safety with relapse prevention treatment (RPT), both in individual format, with a treatment-as-usual (TAU) control condition in a randomized controlled trial (Hien, Cohen, Litt, Miele and Capstick). At the end of treatment, patients in both Seeking Safety and RPT had significant reductions in substance [...]

Read the full article →

Dual Diagnosis PTSD and Substance Abuse Treatments and Issues / Part 3

February 23, 2008

Stephanie Covington has created a trauma specific model for women as well in 2003. In the introduction to her program, Covington (2003) discusses the integrated treatment approach focusing on women. “The connection between addiction and trauma for women is intricate and not easily disentangled” (p. 16). She goes on to discuss that the treatment provider [...]

Read the full article →

Dual Diagnosis PTSD and Substance Abuse Treatments and Issues / Part 2

February 22, 2008

Programs other than ‘Seeking Safety’ have been introduced, but few have any research backing. The ATRIUM Model, Addiction, Trauma, Recovery — Integrated Model, was introduced in 2001 by Dusty Miller and Laurie Guidy. They contended that twelve sessions of treatment per week running to 1.5 hours at a time, structured according to their treatment model, [...]

Read the full article →

Dual Diagnosis PTSD and Substance Abuse Treatments and Issues

February 21, 2008

Najavits et al (1997), identify treatment as crucial, “not only because of the prevalence and severity of co-occurring PTSD and substance abuse, but also because treatments that are typically used for PTSD or substance abuse alone may be insufficient for their combination”. Problems of using treatments suited to one or other of the disorders with [...]

Read the full article →